You Don't Have to Like Your Students (And They Don't Have to Like You)

There's a particular kind of tired that sets in after a professional development session where a consultant (who hasn't stepped inside an actual classroom since the second Obama administration) explains, with a laminated slide deck and boundless confidence, that the reason a student threw a chair is because you hadn't built a strong enough relationship with them.

Teaching has always been demanding work. But somewhere along the way, "building relationships" morphed from a healthy professional practice into a weaponized catch-all that quietly placed the full weight of classroom behavior on individual teachers - and that, frankly, needs to stop.

🔉 But first, a word from our sponsor for teachers who want to stay on top of all things tech:

Learn how to code faster with AI in 5 mins a day

You're spending 40 hours a week writing code that AI could do in 10.

While you're grinding through pull requests, 200k+ engineers at OpenAI, Google & Meta are using AI to ship faster.

How?

The Code newsletter teaches them exactly which AI tools to use and how to use them.

Here's what you get:

• AI coding techniques used by top engineers at top companies in just 5 mins a day

• Tools and workflows that cut your coding time in half

• Tech insights that keep you 6 months ahead

Sign up and get access to the Ultimate Claude code guide to ship 5X faster.

Join 200K+ engineers

And now, back to making you an even better teacher. ⬇️ 

🚀 Noteworthy News

The Relationship Industrial Complex (And Why You're Exhausted)

The original idea was sound enough: students learn better when they feel safe and respected. Nobody is arguing with that.

The problem began when "feeling respected" quietly evolved into "feeling personally understood, emotionally validated, and deeply seen" - by you, individually, for each of the 150 students on your roster.

What started as a pedagogical principle became an unpaid second job. The emotional labor crept in slowly: learning everyone's preferred TikTok formats, pretending to have opinions about MrBeast, writing personalized affirmation notes for students who, let's be honest, will not remember your name by Thanksgiving.

And here's the really insidious part: when behavior issues inevitably arise (and they will), the framework is already in place to circle back to you. "Did you check in with him this morning?" "Have you tried connecting over his interests?"

It's an unfalsifiable loop.

If it works, the relationship model gets the credit. If it doesn't, there must not have been enough relationship. Teachers are left on a hamster wheel of emotional performance with no clear finish line, burning through their energy reserves before second period.

This isn't to say warmth doesn't matter- it absolutely does. But there's a meaningful difference between being a warm professional and being emotionally enmeshed with your students. One is sustainable. The other quietly leads people out of the profession entirely.

The "Predictable Pro" Protocol: Your New Low-Prep Superpower

The Predictable Pro Protocol is a subtractive strategy - meaning the goal is to remove things from your plate, not add to it. It won't ask you to redesign your classroom culture, attend a weekend retreat, or develop a new morning meeting ritual. It runs on three steps, and the whole thing takes about four minutes to internalize.

Step 1: The Emotional Audit Drop. Cross off any task you're doing solely to "win kids over." Stop pretending to care about MrBeast. Stop memorizing TikTok dances. Stop writing personalized affirmation notes if they drain you. If it's not sustainable, it's not a strategy - it's a performance.

Step 2: The Neutral Narrator Redirection. Stop framing behavior around your relationship. Drop "Jimmy, I'm so disappointed, I thought we had a good rapport" in favor of boring neutrality: "Jimmy, the expectation is that we sit during instruction. Please take your seat." You are a referee, not a disappointed parent.

Step 3: The Customer Service Boundary. Treat students the way a good doctor treats patients: with polite, respectful, professional distance. Greet them at the door, teach the lesson fairly, grade consistently, then pack your bag at contract hours without an ounce of guilt.

The beauty of boring neutrality is that it is, paradoxically, one of the most powerful tools in a classroom. When behavior is addressed through a consistent, impersonal framework (the same tone, the same expectation, the same follow-through every single tim) students stop trying to find the edge of your patience, because they've already mapped it and it never moves.

Predictability is its own form of safety. And of course, you know your students better than anyone else. This strategy is a suggested one for when you’re at your wits end and not a mandatory decree for a better classroom.

What "Fair, Not Friends" Actually Looks Like in the Room

Practically speaking, the Fair Not Friends framework looks like this: greet every student the same way at the door - a smile and a "glad you're here" costs nothing and takes three seconds. Deliver instruction with the same energy whether it's period one or period six. Apply consequences the same way on a Monday as you do on a Friday. Grade the same rubric whether the kid frustrates you or makes you genuinely proud.

These aren't cold acts — they are, in fact, deeply respectful ones. You're signaling: "Your standing in this room has nothing to do with my mood, your mood, or whether you remembered my coffee order."

The language shift alone makes a significant difference.

Compare "I'm really disappointed in your behavior today — after everything we've talked about, I thought we were better than this" with "That's not in line with our class expectations. Here's what happens next." 

The first is a relationship transaction with emotional stakes. The second is just information. Students, particularly those who have complicated histories with adults, tend to respond far better to the second. It removes the guessing game of "how mad is she?" and replaces it with the far calmer question of "what is the outcome?"

And on the subject of guilt: leaving at contract hours is not abandonment. Declining to answer emails at 10pm is not negligence. Not knowing which Minecraft content creator a student currently worships is not a character flaw.

Sustainable professional boundaries are the thing that keeps teachers in classrooms for decades - and students deserve teachers who are still standing in year fifteen, not just year three.

The Gift You're Actually Giving Them

By stepping off the relationship-building hamster wheel, you're not abandoning your students. You're quietly preparing them for a world that won't always love them back, and teaching them how to show up anyway.

Here's the reflection that tends to reframe everything: the implicit lesson of emotional enmeshment is that students only need to cooperate, learn, and function within relationships where they feel a deep personal bond.

But that's not how most of the world works.

Their future manager is not going to know their love language. Their landlord is not going to ask how they're doing before discussing rent. The DMV clerk is — well, the DMV clerk is going to be the DMV clerk regardless of the circumstances.

By modeling consistent, boundaried, fair professionalism, teachers are actually delivering one of the most practical life skills available: how to function respectfully and productively with people you didn't choose and may never warm to.

There's also something quietly profound about the message a stable, predictable classroom sends to students who have experienced the opposite at home. For a child who never knows what version of an adult they're going to get on any given day, a teacher who shows up the same way every morning (calm, prepared, consistent, not requiring anything emotionally in return) is not a cold experience.

It's an anchoring one.

Safety doesn't always feel like warmth. Sometimes it feels like a system that works the same way whether you had a bad night or not.

And finally, there is the matter of your adrenal glands, which, unlike a good lesson plan, cannot be rebuilt from scratch over a long weekend. Chronic emotional labor has real physiological consequences. The sustainable version of a teaching career is not built on performing maximum warmth for 180 school days a year. It's built on doing excellent, fair, consistent work — and then, when the final bell rings, actually leaving.

Permission Slip: You Can Put It Down Now

Consider this your official, non-laminated, no-consultant-required permission slip: you are allowed to stop performing emotional labor that was never in your job description. You don't have to love every kid. You don't have to be liked. You don't have to know what's trending on any platform this week.

What you do have to do (and what you probably already do extraordinarily well) is show up consistently, treat people fairly, and teach the material. That is the whole job. Everything else is extra credit.

This week, consider picking just one thing from the emotional audit: one performance, one ritual, one late-night task that you've been doing to "build rapport" rather than because it genuinely helps.

Put it down.

See what happens to your energy by Thursday. Willing to bet it's still there.

WHAT DO YOU THINK?

We would LOVE to hear from you!

Reply to this email, or send us a message on Instagram! We’re here to walk with you in these crazy times!

Part of what makes The PEN Weekly community so special is the fact that our readers are teachers from around the world! We’re not going to lie, we think that’s pretty darn cool!

We’ll see you again on Wednesday 🍎

Share this newsletter!

Do you know someone who would appreciate reading the PEN? Share this newsletter with them! Our goal is to reach as many teachers as possible, and to build a community of teachers supporting teachers.