We tell students to debate. We may even encourage diverse opinions. But ‘hot topic’ classroom discussion still feels like everyone is always just ready to attack.

This week’s Tech Tool helps us search deeper instead of louder. And this week’s Brainy Bit research asks a harder question: are we teaching disagreement… or just division?

Happy Wednesday - you’re about to become an even better teacher in the next 8 minutes.

🚀 Noteworthy News

👉️ Shocking: Nearly a third of kids try to “swipe” books like phones—why early literacy is changing.

👉️ Provocative: Ed-tech is booming—but most of it doesn’t actually help students learn.

👉️ Alarming: How many exam grades are messed up by marking errors? The answers may surprise you.

🔉But first, a word from today’s sponsor for teachers looking to upgrade their resume beyond the classroom:

Feel confident with AI at work—no coding background required.

Unlock the best daily AI use cases to work smarter.

The AI for Business & Finance Certificate from Columbia Business School Exec Ed gives you practical AI skills you can apply immediately—plus a credential from one of the world’s top business schools.

Save $300 with code SAVE300 + $200 with early enrollment by Feb. 17.

Enroll Today

And now back to making you an even better teacher 👇️ 

TECH TOOL

When “Just Google It” Fails

Research projects start the same way every time. Students type a question into Google and fall into a black hole of blogs, ads, and “Top 10” lists. The information might look polished, but it isn’t always reliable.

The Solution: SciSpace – Find Topics

SciSpace has a tool called Find Topics that works like a search engine, but only pulls from peer-reviewed research. You type a question, it gives a clear summary answer, and then lists the academic sources underneath. Each source includes a short explanation and the full citation.

So what’s the difference? Every result is backed by real studies. 

Ask “Who won the Super Bowl?” and it won’t give you last weekend’s score.

But ask, “What is the cultural significance of the Super Bowl halftime show and its impact on societal trends?” and now we’re cooking. That’s where this tool shines.

You can try it for free, even without an account. The paid plan unlocks the full suite of research tools, though it may feel pricey for casual use. 

Is This For YOUR Classroom?

This isn’t for trivia or quick facts. It’s for middle school and up, where deeper questions and evidence matter, especially for essays and reports.

Strategies That Work:

1. Upgrade the Question: Teach students to rewrite shallow questions into analytical ones.

2. Source Snapshot: Have students compare two cited studies before writing.

3. Topic Vetting: Use it to test if a research idea has enough academic depth (especially useful for teachers completing their Master’s or above!).

Fast answers are easy. Strong research takes intention. Tools like this help students search smarter, not just faster.

BRAINY BIT

When Disagreement Turns Personal

We disagree. That does not mean we hate each other.

But lately, it feels like it does, no matter the issue.

TLDR: After structured argument training and fishbowl debates, students challenged each other often. But they rarely built on each other’s ideas. Real dialogue was harder than rebuttal.

The Study: Arguing for democracy

Four intermediate-grade classes worked through an adapted version of Gronostay’s argumentation training. In this model, teachers introduce a topic, model how to build an argument, and then run structured “fishbowl” discussions where a small group debated in the center while others observed and later rotated in.

Researchers video-recorded the discussions and analyzed them closely. They looked at how students responded to each other. Did they simply disagree? Or did they actually build on, refine, and integrate someone else’s thinking?

The Results:

Here’s the uncomfortable part.

Only 8.7% of arguments followed the full structure of thesis, justification, and conclusion. Most students made claims, but didn’t fully support or wrap them up.

Even more telling: 63.5% of contributions were oppositional. Students were good at saying, “I disagree.”

But only 2.8% of moves showed integration - meaning very few students said something like, “I see your point, and I’d add…” or “Building on what you said…”

Some classrooms managed real back-and-forth exchanges. Others stayed stuck in parallel monologues.

Same training. Same structure. Different results.

Which tells us something big: teaching kids (and ourselves) to argue well is hard. It doesn’t happen automatically. 

In YOUR Classroom:

In a world of instant opinions and viral certainty, structured disagreement is not optional - it’s essential.

Here’s how to implement these results into your classroom discussions today:

Strategies That Work:

1. Teach “build” moves, not just “but” moves. Model sentence stems like “I agree with part of that, and…” or “Can you explain why you think that?” so disagreement doesn’t default to shutdown.

2. Make challenge normal, not dramatic. Treat respectful pushback as a routine classroom move, not a special event reserved for big debates.

3. Debrief the discussion itself. After a tough conversation, ask: “Did we actually respond to each other, or just wait our turn?” That reflection builds the skill faster than another lecture ever will.

Arguing well, and having the ability to challenge your own beliefs and understanding, is learned.

And the classroom may be the last safe place to practice it.

WHAT DO YOU THINK?

We would LOVE to hear from you!

Reply to this email, or send us a message on Instagram! We’re here to walk with you in these crazy times!

Part of what makes The PEN Weekly community so special is the fact that our readers are teachers from around the world! We’re not going to lie, we think that’s pretty darn cool!

We’ll see you again on Monday 🍎

Share this newsletter!

Do you know someone who would appreciate reading the PEN? Share this newsletter with them! Our goal is to reach as many teachers as possible, and to build a community of teachers supporting teachers.